Focus and Scope

Pancaran Pendidikan is an online-International Journal dedicated to publishing  the good quality research and non reserach in

1. Natural Science (Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry and Biology) education 

2. Social Science (Economy, Geography, and History) education 

3. Language and humanities education 

4. Formal, informal and non formal educatioan study

5. Pre scholl and elementary school study issue

3. Other related educational issue 

Section Policies

Social Science

  • Checked Open Submissions
  • Checked Indexed
  • Checked Peer Reviewed

1st ICONSSED 2017

  • Checked Open Submissions
  • Checked Indexed
  • Checked Peer Reviewed

1st IC CGANT 2017

  • Checked Open Submissions
  • Checked Indexed
  • Checked Peer Reviewed

Article

  • Checked Open Submissions
  • Checked Indexed
  • Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

  1. All manuscripts that are submitted to the journal are reviewed initially by the editors. If the article has a sufficient and appropriate research focus, it will then enter the review process. The journal has a double-blind review policy.
  2. Manuscripts are critically evaluated by at least 2 reviewers. Acceptable manuscripts are usually returned to the author for consideration of comments and criticism.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

About Pancaran Pendidikan Journal

PANCARAN PENDIDIKAN Journal is a journal of Education, Teaching and Learning published by FKIP- the University of Jember since 1995. According to a decree of the Directorate General of Higher Education, Department of Education number 134/DIKTI/KEP/2001, September 14, 2001 about the list of Scientific Journal Accreditation of Directorate General of Higher Education. This journal had been accredited as a national scientific journal. Five years later this journal is no longger accredited but it remains as a national scientific journal according to ISSN number 0852-601X (Print) and ISSN number 2549-838X (Online) and even indexed by CROSSREFF, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, IPI BETA and Directory of Research Journal Indexing. The journal is published four times a year, namely February, May, August and November. The articles contains some results of research and non-research of education studies.

Journal Open Access Statement

Journal Pancaran Pendidikan applies the Creative Commons (CC BY SA) license to works we publish. This license was developed to facilitate open access – namely, free immediate access to, and unrestricted reuse of, original works of all types. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees, for virtually any purpose. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse these articles, as long as the author and original source are properly cited.

Journal Pancaran pendidikan also applies Budapest Open Acces Initiative’s definition of Open Acces

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Pancaran Pendidikan is an international peer-reviewed journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the editorial board, editors, authors, peer reviewers and the publisher (Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Jember). This statement is based on COPE's best practice guidelines for editors of journals.

 

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Pancaran Pendidikan journal is an essential element in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It directly reflects the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. The peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree on the ethical behavior standards expected of all parties involved in the publication act: the author, the editor of the journal, the reviewer, the publisher and the society.

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Jember as the publishers of Pancaran Pendidikan takes the supervisory duties on all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprinting or other commercial revenues have no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, publishers and the editorial board will help to communicate with other journals as well as publishers if it is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

 

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

 

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

 

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

 

  

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

 

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

 

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

 

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

 

Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

 

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

 

Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

 

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

 

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

 

Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

 

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.